Showing posts with label Maharshi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Maharshi. Show all posts

Saturday, October 6, 2018

Favourite Stories of Bhagavaan Shree Ramana Maharshi: King Janakar and Sage Sukar

[Once a questioner asked Bhagavaan, “Can the atyasramis (those beyond all states) own property?” Bhagavaan replied, “There is no restriction for them. They may do what they please. Sukar is said to have married and begotten children.” — #Talk #291, #Talks #with #Maharshi]

Sukar was the only son of #Vyaasar, author of the Brahma Sutras and the Puranaas and master of the Vedas. From his childhood, Sukar had understood through pure intellect and by freedom from distractions that the world is full of delusion. His mind was disturbed when he tried to probe into the source of delusion. He went to his father on Mt. Meru and voiced his doubts. Vyaasar, the very incarnation of Lord Vishnu, addressed Sukar’s misgivings but his son was not satisfied. Understanding his son’s mental state, Vyaasar told him, “Dear son! If you still harbour doubts, go to the king of Videhaa, King Janakar. May you benefit from all that is virtuous!”

Sukar reached the kingdom of Janakar with considerable effort and waited near the king’s private chambers. The servants announced his arrival to the king. Janakar wanted to test the determination of Sukar and thus, the servants did not give him admittance for seven long days. But Sukar maintained his equanimity. Seven days later, the king’s retinue allowed him to have an audience with the king with all the royal courtesies. Beautiful men and women attempted to entertain him with song and dance. Sukar was neither elated by this royal treatment nor was he flustered by the king’s earlier indifference. Janakar was very pleased with Sukar’s immaculate attitude. He offered him the sixteen kinds of hospitality, praised his ancestry and humbly addressed him thus, “It is my great good fortune that you, who are endowed with the knowledge of Brahman, came all the way here, seeking audience with me. Please command me as to what service I can render you”.

Sukar reiterated all that he had told his father and raised the question that was tormenting him, “What is the origin of delusion? How does one overcome it?” Janakar’s response was the same as had been his father’s. So, Sukar explained that he had heard this response before, and it had not resolved his doubts. Janakar then elaborated further, “You are fully detached from all things, are without doubt the very embodiment of Brahman. What your father stated, what I have understood and what you are contemplating, are all the same— the knowledge of the Self. Total detachment is essential for this. You are seeking the source of delusion. And, it has brought you all this way. This very desire is the manifestation of delusion. Attempting to know anything other than the Self is delusion. Such a desire also occurs by the very force of the Self — attempting to know and knowing it. However, in the attempt to quench one’s desire to know, the Self gets lost in the background and one is caught in a vicious whirlpool. Therefore, conquer this desire to know more about delusion and endeavour to attain the state of equanimity once again, for that is your true state.

On hearing this explanation, Sukar became completely silent, was emancipated from all desire and filled with perfect contentment. He now understood the greatness of his father through the renowned Janakar.

கருணாகரமுனி ரமணாரியன் திருவடி போற்றி 🌸🙏

🌺 திருச்சிற்றம்பலம் 🌺


posted from Bloggeroid

Saturday, July 15, 2017

Talk #121: Talks between Bhagavaan Shree Ramana Maharshi and two Moslems

Devotee: Has God a form?

Maharshi: Who says so?

D.: Well, if God has no form is it proper to worship idols?

M.: Leave God alone because He is unknown. What about you? Have you a form?

D.: Yes. I am this and so and so.

M.: So then, you are a man with limbs, about three and a half cubits high, with beard, etc. Is it so?

D.: Certainly.

M.: Then do you find yourself so in deep sleep?

D.: After waking I perceive that I was asleep. Therefore by inference I remained thus in deep sleep also.

M.: If you are the body why do they bury the corpse after death? The body must refuse to be buried.

D.: No, I am the subtle jiva within the gross body.

M.: So you see that you are really formless; but you are at present identifying yourself with the body. So long as you are formful why should you not worship the formless God as being formful?

The questioner was baffled and perplexed.

😁😁😁

Likewise throughout "Talks..." you can find numerous occasions where people came to examine Bhagavaan or to prove their -ism was better than Advaitham (Bhagavaan never identified Himself with any religion or group. His teachings were completely based on His experience and not based on any scriptures). Sometimes Bhagavaan brought such people to the right path. Sometimes He would say what they wanted to hear and got rid of them. Sometimes He kept quiet. Sometimes He paid them back in their own coin. When He did pay them back, it was always in a spectacular way!! With just one simple question, He would bring down their entire defensive structures.

🌼🙏🌺

Tuesday, July 4, 2017

Talk 92: Part of #Bhagavaan #Shree #Ramana #Maharshi's reply to a question asked by a visitor

Unbroken ‘I-I’ is the ocean infinite, the ego, ‘I’ thought, remains only a bubble on it and is called jiva, i.e., individual soul. The bubble too is water; when it bursts it only mixes in the ocean. When it remains a bubble it is still a part of the ocean. Ignorant of this simple truth, innumerable methods under different denominations, such as yoga, bhakti, karma....... each again with many modifications, are being taught with great skill and in intricate detail only to entice the seekers and confuse their minds. So also are the religions and sects and dogmas. What are they all for? Only for knowing the Self. They are aids and practices required for knowing the Self.

Objects perceived by the senses are spoken of as immediate knowledge (pratyaksha). Can anything be as direct as the Self - always experienced without the aid of the senses? Sense perceptions can only be indirect knowledge, and not direct knowledge. Only one’s own awareness is direct knowledge, as is the common experience of one and all. *No aids are needed to know one’s own Self, i.e., to be aware.*

The one Infinite Unbroken Whole (plenum) becomes aware of itself as ‘I’. This is its original name. All other names, e.g., OM, are later growths. *Liberation is only to remain aware of the Self.* The mahavakya “I am Brahman” is its authority. Though the ‘I’ is always experienced, yet one’s attention has to be drawn to it. Only then does knowledge dawn. Thus the need for the instruction of the Upanishads and of wise sages.

🌸🙏🌼🙏🌸

Tuesday, May 23, 2017

Talk #46 from "#Talks #with #Maharshi"

... #Bhagavaan said that *the mind is only identity of the Self with the body.* It is a false ego that is created; it creates false phenomena in its turn, and appears to move in them; all these are false. *The Self is the only Reality.* If the false identity vanishes the persistence of the Reality becomes apparent. It does not mean that Reality is not here and now. It is always there and eternally the same. It is also in everyone’s experience. For everyone knows that he is. “Who is he?”. Subjectively, “Who am I?” The false ego is associated with objects; this ego itself is its own object. *Objectivity is the falsity. Subject is alone the Reality.* Do not confound yourself with the object, namely the body. This gives rise to the false ego, consequently of the world and your movements therein with the resulting misery. *Do not think yourself to be this, that or anything; to be so and so, or to be such and such. Only leave off the falsity. The Reality will reveal itself.* The scriptures say that the *Self is nityasiddha, ever present,* and yet speak of the removal of ajnana. If Self is (nitya) always and (siddha) present, how can there be ajnana? For whom is the ajnana? These are contradictory. But such statements are for guiding the earnest seeker in the right way. He does not readily understand the only Truth if mentioned in plain words as in "natwam naham neme janadhipah" (not thou, nor I, nor these kings ...). Sri Krishna declared the Truth, but Arjuna could not grasp it. Later Krishna plainly says that people confound Him with the body, whereas in reality He was not born nor will He die. Still Arjuna requires the whole Gita for the Truth to be made clear to him.

Look, *the Self is only Be-ing, not being this or that. It is simple Being. Be - and there is an end of the ignorance.* Enquire for whom is the ignorance. The ego arises when you wake up from sleep. *In deep sleep you do not say that you are sleeping and that you are going to wake up or that you have been sleeping so long. But still you are there.* Only when you are awake you say that you have slept. Your wakefulness comprises sleep also in it. Realise your pure Be-ing. Let there be no confusion with the body. *The body is the result of thoughts. The thoughts will play as usual, but you will not be affected. You were not concerned with the body when asleep; so you can always remain.*

Mr. Ekanatha Rao: How can anyone reconcile such activity with the wage-earning which is a necessity for worldly people?

B.: *Actions form no bondage. Bondage is only the false notion, “I am the doer.”* Leave off such thoughts and let the body and senses play their role, unimpeded by your interference.

🔥 Om Namo Bhagavathe Shree Arunaachala Ramanaaya 🔥

🌸🙏🌸

Thursday, February 9, 2017

Bhagavaan Shree Ramana Maharshi's daily life 

(as told by Prof. NR Krishnamurti to V Ganesan):

- Personal cleanliness
- Tidiness of dress
- Habitual wearing of vibhuti and kumkum on the forehead
- Equal sharing of all enjoyment with those around him
- Strict adherence to a time schedule
- Performing useful work however ‘low’ it may be
- Never leaving a work unfinished
- The pursuit of perfection in every action
- Incessant activity except while sleeping or resting after a spell of hard work
- Never considering oneself superior to others
- Speaking the truth always, or strict silence if the expression of truth would hurt or lower the reputation of others
- Perfect self-help
- Never asking another to do a piece of work which can be done by oneself
- Taking full responsibility for failure, if any, without shifting the blame on others
- Accepting success or failure with equanimity
- Never disturbing the peace of others
- Leaving the leaf-plate clean after eating
- Complete non-interference in the affairs of others
- Never worrying about the future

🔯 ஓம் நமோ பகவதே ஸ்ரீ அருணாசல ரமணாய 🔯

🌸🙏

Tuesday, April 5, 2016

Word group "I Am That I Am" is also inadequate to describe God

A text is doing rounds in WhatsApp. I have attached it after my response. Vested criminals are misguiding/cheating the public using it! 😠

🌸🌹🍀🍁🌺🌻🌼

This reply was given by Bhagavaan Sri Ramana Maharshi to a Parangi according to his mindset. Bhagavaan didn't intend it for general public.

Likewise, He praised about Islam to a group of Muslims. So, can we all utter the "sacred" word 3 times, divorce our wives and go for 10 years old girl children? 😂

He also recommended doing Jabam to a Brahmin woman. So, can we all do Jabam, lose energy and go bonkers? 😂

If you want to know what He really said, read

💮 நான் யார்? (Who Am I?)
💮 உள்ளது நாற்பது (Reality in Forty Verses - commentary by Sri Saadhu Om)
💮 உபதேச உந்தியார் (Upadesa Undhiyaar - commentary by Sri Saadhu Om).

Don't get fooled by these cheats!!

If Bhagavaan's words mean a lot to them, let them follow His words first. Bhagavaan didn't recommend or approve religious conversions. Will they stop their conversion business?

Several years ago they used Swaami Vivekaanandha's words to sell their -ism. Once Sri Raamakrishna Mission fired a salvo, these cheats went silent. Now, they are using Bhagavaan's words. I don't expect any salvo this time as there is still too much Parangi infestation at Sri Ramanaashramam.

"I am that I am" is one of the phrases to describe The God/Brahmam/பரம்பொருள். It also falls short like all the words & phrases including Bhagavaan's own "நான்" & "தான்". God is beyond thoughts & words. Naming or explaining something that is beyond words will always result in error. Pl remember the following beautiful lines from Thamizh:

கண்டவர் விண்டிலர்
விண்டவர் கண்டிலர்

Those who realized won't talk
Those who talk are not realized

Bhagavaan was a கண்டவர். He used several words, phrases, etc. to guide us to The Almighty/Arunaachalaa/உள்ள பொருள். That's the best a real Guru can do.

🌸🌹🍀🍁🌺🌻🌼

From: ~~~ Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi, Talk 106.

Q.:
How shall I realise God?

M.:
God is an unknown entity.

Moreover He is external.

Whereas,
the Self is always with you
and it is you.

Why do you leave out what is intimate
and go in for what is external?

Q.:
What is this Self again?

M.:
The Self is known to everyone
but not clearly.

You always exist.

The Be-ing is the Self.

‘I am’ is the name of God.

Of all the definitions of God,
none is indeed so well put
as the Biblical statement

“I AM THAT I AM”

in EXODUS (Chap. 3).

There are other statements,
such as
Brahmaivaham,
Aham Brahmasmi
and Soham.

But none is so direct as the name
JEHOVAH = I AM.

The Absolute Being is what is -
It is the Self.
It is God.

Knowing the Self,
God is known.

In fact God is none other
than the Self.

posted from Bloggeroid